JUM Parker Laboratories, Inc
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stiles, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lucey, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stiles, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lucey, J. A.
© 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 24:501-516 • 0278-4297


Technical Advance

Tissue-Mimicking Liquid for Use in Exposimetry

Timothy A. Stiles, MS, Ernest L. Madsen, PhD, Gary R. Frank, Thomas Diehl, MS and John A. Lucey, PhD

Medical Physics (T.A.S., E.L.M., G.R.F.) and Food Science (J.A.L.) Departments, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin USA; and Diehl Technical, Inc, Defiance, Ohio USA.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Timothy A. Stiles, MS, Medical Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1300 University Ave, Room 1530, Madison, WI 53706 USA. E-mail: tastiles{at}wisc.edu

Objective. Current determinations of diagnostic ultrasound exposure parameters (eg, peak rarefactional pressure and pulse intensity integral) are intended to correspond to propagation through soft tissue with a propagation speed of 1540 m/s and attenuation of 0.3 dB • cm–1 • MHz–1. These current measurements are made in water, which has very little attenuation, and a linear derating factor is applied to approximate 0.3 dB • cm–1 • MHz–1 attenuation. The fact that propagation through water as well as through soft tissue involves nonlinear propagation is not directly addressed. A better way to determine exposure parameters would be to use a liquid that has the desired tissue-mimicking properties, including a value of the nonlinearity parameter B/A representative of soft tissue. To be of practical use in the laboratory, the ultrasonic properties of this liquid must remain stable and spatially uniform for many months or years without need for periodic mixing by the user. Methods. Fifty-two samples of fat-free milk that was concentrated to one third of its original volume by ultrafiltration were created. Each sample was preserved by a different method. The speed of sound, attenuation, and nonlinearity parameter B/A of each sample were periodically monitored by narrowband through-transmission techniques. Results. Six of the 52 samples remained liquid and retained acceptably stable acoustic properties over 22 months of storage at room temperature. Conclusions. Fat-free milk, concentrated via ultrafiltration and preserved in 1 of 6 different methods, has been found to be a stable tissue-mimicking liquid with acoustic properties appropriate for use in exposimetry.

Key Words: acoustic output • acoustic properties • bovine milk • exposimetry • liquid • tissue mimic

Abbreviations: PII, pulse intensity integral • pr, peak rarefactional pressure • TM, tissue-mimicking







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.