JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yasaka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Minematsu, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yasaka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Minematsu, K.
© 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 24:155-159 • 0278-4297

Right-to-Left Shunt Evaluated at the Aortic Arch by Contrast-Enhanced Transesophageal Echocardiography

Masahiro Yasaka, MD, Koichi Ikeno, MD, Ryoichi Otsubo, MD, Hiroshi Oe, MD, Keiko Nagano, MD and Kazuo Minematsu, MD

Cerebrovascular Division, Department of Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Masahiro Yasaka, MD, Cerebrovascular Division, Department of Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishirodai, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan. E-mail: yasakam{at}hsp.ncvc.go.jp

Objective. The right-to-left shunt (RLS) is diagnosed by contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring of the bilateral atria (cTEE-BA). However, the procedure is often disturbed by nonsmoke spontaneous individual contrast (NSSIC) with fast motion, which appears in the left atrium after respiratory maneuvers without administration of a contrast medium and moves past in several seconds. We attempted to perform cTEE monitoring of the aortic arch (cTEE-AA) for evaluation of the RLS and compared the findings with those of cTEE-BA. Methods. Both cTEE-BA and cTEE-AA were performed in 168 patients with ischemic stroke (133 men and 35 women; mean age ± SD, 62.0 ± 14.4 years). The frequency of NSSIC in the left atrium was compared with that in the aortic arch during the respiratory maneuver. When contrast much brighter than the NSSIC was visualized in the left atrium and the aortic arch during the respiratory maneuver with administration of the contrast medium, we considered the RLS to be positive in the cTEE-BA and cTEE-AA, respectively. Findings were then compared between the 2 examinations. Results. Nonsmoke spontaneous individual contrast was more frequently observed in the left atrium than the aortic arch (61.3% versus 14.9%; {chi}2 test, P < .0001). The RLS was positive in 34 patients in the cTEE-BA and in 39 patients in the cTEE-AA. The sensitivity and specificity of the cTEE-AA for the cTEE-BA were 100% and 96.3%, respectively. Conclusions. The cTEE-AA may be an alternative method for detection of an RLS, especially in patients with a large amount of NSSIC in the left atrium.

Key Words: aortic arch • patent foramen ovale • respiratory maneuver • right-to-left shunt • transesophageal echocardiography

Abbreviations: cTEE-AA, contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring of the aortic arch • cTEE-BA, contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring of the bilateral atria • NSSIC, nonsmoke spontaneous individual contrast • PAVF, pulmonary arteriovenous fistula • PFO, patent foramen ovale • RLS, right-to-left shunt

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.