JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takacs, P.
Right arrow Articles by Duthely, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takacs, P.
Right arrow Articles by Duthely, L.
© 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 24:1477-1481 • 0278-4297

Echogenic Endometrial Fluid Collection in Postmenopausal Women Is a Significant Risk Factor for Disease

Peter Takacs, MD, PhD, Timothy De Santis, MD, M. Catherine Nicholas, MS, RDMS, Usha Verma, MD, Richard Strassberg, MD and Lunthita Duthely, MS

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida USA.

Address correspondence to Peter Takacs, MD, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, D-50, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami School of Medicine, PO Box 016960, Miami, FL 33010 USA. E-mail: ptakacs{at}med.miami.edu

Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess postmenopausal women with endometrial fluid collection and the risk of significant endometrial or cervical disease. Methods. A retrospective chart review was conducted of 343 postmenopausal women with endometrial fluid collection on pelvic sonography. Medical records were reviewed to identify women who underwent an evaluation of the endometrium with endometrial biopsy, hysteroscopy, or hysterectomy after the sonographic examination. Clinical and sonographic characteristics were compared between women with diagnoses of cervical or endometrial cancer or hyperplasia (nonbenign group) and women with benign conditions (benign group). Results. The endometrium was significantly thicker in the nonbenign group compared with the benign group (mean ± SD, 9.9 ± 7.4 versus 5.9 ± 4.1 mm; P = .016). None of the patients with adenocarcinoma of the endometrium had endometrial thickness of 3 mm or less, but 2 with endocervical cancer did. Echogenic fluid in the endometrial cavity was significantly more likely to be found in the nonbenign group compared with the benign group (45.8% versus 4.8%; P < .01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that echogenic fluid in the endometrial cavity was the only significant risk factor for nonbenign conditions (odds ratio, 10.94; 95% confidence interval, 2.67–44.84; P < .01). Conclusions. Postmenopausal women with endometrial fluid collection on sonography should undergo endometrial sampling if the endometrial lining is thicker than 3 mm or the endometrial fluid is echogenic. If the lining is 3 mm or less and the endometrial fluid is clear, endometrial sampling is not necessary, but we recommend endocervical sampling to rule out endocervical cancer.

Key Words: echogenicity • endometrial cancer • endometrial fluid • menopause

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval • HRT, hormone replacement therapy • OR, odds ratio







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.