JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Celik, H.
Right arrow Articles by Arac, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Celik, H.
Right arrow Articles by Arac, M.
© 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 24:39-47 • 0278-4297

Characterization of Hyperechoic Focal Liver Lesions

Quantitative Evaluation With Pulse Inversion Harmonic Imaging in the Late Phase of Levovist

Halil Celik, MD, Hakan Özdemir, MD, Cem Yücel, MD, Serap Gultekin, MD, Suna O. Oktar, MD and Mehmet Arac, MD

Department of Radiology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Halil Celik, MD, Department of Radiology, Gazi University School of Medicine, 1 Kat, 06510 Besevler, Ankara, Turkey. E-mail: celik72{at}yahoo.com

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate hyperechoic focal liver lesions with pulse inversion harmonic imaging in the late phase of SH U 508A (Levovist; Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) and to determine whether quantitative evaluation improves the characterization of the lesions. Methods. Twenty-six patients with hyperechoic liver lesions were enrolled in this study. Pulse inversion harmonic imaging was performed before and after administration of Levovist. Scan data were digitally stored, and each lesion was analyzed with a personal computer–based quantification package. All lesions were confirmed by histologic or triphasic spiral computed tomographic examinations. The intensity was measured in decibels in regions of interest drawn within the lesion and surrounding liver parenchyma. The lesion-liver ratios were than calculated. After contrast agent administration, a ratio equal to or greater than 1 was presumed benign, whereas a ratio of less than 1 was considered malignant. Results. Nine malignant (7 metastases, 1 hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1 cholangiocarcinoma) and 17 benign (14 hemangioma, 1 focal nodular hyperplasia, 1 focal fatty change, and 1 inflammatory pseudotumor) hyperechoic lesions were quantitatively evaluated. All malignant (n = 9) and 2 benign lesions (1 hemangioma and 1 inflammatory pseudotumor) had ratios of less than 1. In 15 of 17 benign lesions, the ratios were equal to or greater than 1. The intensity ratios calculated for benign and malignant lesions showed a statistically significant difference (P < .05). Conclusions. Pulse inversion harmonic imaging with quantitative evaluation facilitates the differential diagnosis of hyperechoic focal liver lesions. A lesion-liver ratio equal to or greater than 1 predicts a benign nature, assuming that malignant lesions show a ratio of less than 1.

Key Words: contrast media • hyperechoic liver tumors • pulse inversion harmonic imaging • ultrasonography

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomographic • FNH, focal nodular hyperplasia • HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma • PIHI, pulse inversion harmonic imaging • ROI, region of interest




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. W. Anderson, J. B. Kruskal, and R. A. Kane
Benign Hepatic Tumors and Iatrogenic Pseudotumors1
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 211 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
H.-X. Xu, M.-D. Lu, G.-J. Liu, X.-Y. Xie, Z.-F. Xu, Y.-L. Zheng, and J.-Y. Liang
Imaging of Peripheral Cholangiocarcinoma With Low-Mechanical Index Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and SonoVue: Initial Experience
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2006; 25(1): 23 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.