JUM GE Healthcare
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amodio, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Foresto, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amodio, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Foresto, C.
© 2004 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 23:951-957 • 0278-4297


Case Series

Polyorchidism

Report of 3 Cases and Review of the Literature

John B. Amodio, MD, Majid Maybody, MD, Christya Slowotsky, MD, Karen Fried, MD and Christopher Foresto, MD

Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York USA (J.B.A., C.S., C.F.); and Department of Radiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York USA (M.M., K.F.).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to John Amodio, MD, Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, 560 First Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA. E-mail: john.amodio{at}med.nyu.edu.

Objective. To describe the embryologic, clinical, sonographic, and magnetic resonance imaging features of polyorchidism and to review the literature on similar cases. Methods. Over a 5-year period, we encountered 3 patients who were found to have polyorchidism on scrotal sonography. All 3 patients had a painless scrotal mass. Two patients also had magnetic resonance imaging of the scrotum, and the results were correlated with the sonograms. We also performed a literature search for other reports of polyorchidism. Results. One patient had 2 right testicles and a single left testicle. The second patient had 3 left testicles and 1 right testicle. In the third patient, who had 2 left testicles and 1 right testicle, microlithiasis was found in all 3 testes. The supernumerary testes were within the scrotum in all cases. All testicles were identified by sonography. Magnetic resonance imaging in 2 cases provided confirmatory data regarding the presence of an extra testicle but did not add other relevant information. Conservative treatment was chosen in all cases. Conclusions. Polyorchidism is a rare congenital anomaly. There are characteristic sonographic features of polyorchidism, and the diagnosis is often made on the basis of sonography. Magnetic resonance imaging can be used for confirmation but may be more helpful in cases complicated by cryptorchism or neoplasia. Conservative treatment is advised in uncomplicated cases.

Key Words: magnetic resonance imaging • scrotal • sonography • testicular

Abbreviations: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging • T1, longitudinal relaxation time • T2, transverse relaxation time




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
V. Upadhyaya, D. Upadhyaya, and S. Sarkar
Polyorchidism
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, May 1, 2007; 23(3): 164 - 167.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.