JUM Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghofrani, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shamsollahi, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ghofrani, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shamsollahi, M. B.
© 2003 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 22:281-285 • 0278-4297


Technical Advance

Modifying the Cosine Model for Nonstationary Blood Flow Signal Simulation

Sedigheh Ghofrani, Ahmad Ayatollahi and Mohammad Bagher Shamsollahi

Electrical Engineering Department, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran (S.G., A.A.); Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Unit, Tehran, Iran (S.G.); and Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran (M.B.S.).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sedigheh Gofrani, 11 14th St, Pakistan St, Shahid Beheshti St, Pars Gostareh Company, Nabipour, 15317 Tehran, Iran.

Objective. The most important features of the Doppler signal are its nonstationary nature and randomness, which make simulating these kinds of signals difficult. Our intent was to create realistic simulations of these signals. Methods. We generated the Doppler signal for the carotid artery by using the cosine model. We also modified the cosine model to simulate the femoral Doppler signal for the whole cardiac cycle. Results. In auditory comparisons, the simulation results compared favorably with the original data. No appreciable differences were found between the real clinical signals and the simulations for the normal carotid and femoral arteries. However, the calculated normalized root mean square errors were high. Conclusions. The cosine model is simple to implement and requires input of only the spectrum shape variation during a cardiac cycle. In addition, it is more informative than other modeling methods and therefore is preferred over other methods.

Key Words: cosine model • Doppler signal • simulation

Abbreviations: NRMSE, normalized root mean square error • PT, total power







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.