JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Härdig, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Olsson, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Härdig, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Olsson, S. B.
© 2003 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 22:1301-1308 • 0278-4297

Does Low-Energy Ultrasound, Known to Enhance Thrombolysis, Affect the Size of Ischemic Brain Damage?

Bjarne Madsen Härdig, RN, Hans W. Persson, PhD, Gunilla Gidö, PhD and S. Bertil Olsson, MD, PhD

Departments of Cardiology (B.M.H., S.B.O.) and Experimental Brain Research (G.G.), Lund University, and Department of Electrical Measurements, Lund Institute of Technology (H.W.P.), Lund, Sweden.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Bjarne Madsen Härdig, RN, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden. E-mail: bjarne.madsen-hardig{at}kard.lu.se.

Objective. In view of the potentially beneficial effects of ultrasound on fibrinolysis, we aimed to study possible drawbacks of low-energy ultrasound on nonperfused and perfused brain tissue. Methods. A model of transient focal ischemia in anesthetized rats was used. Rats were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: the first exposed to ultrasound, the second a control of the ultrasound group, and the third a method control group. In each group, the right middle cerebral artery was occluded for 1.5 hours, during which time the rats in the ultrasound group were exposed to 1 hour of pulsed ultrasound (1 MHz; spatial-average temporal-average intensity, 0.1 W/cm2 at a duty cycle of 10%). The occlusion period was followed by a 24-hour recirculation period, after which the brains were excised and evaluated. Results. Ultrasound did not affect the volume of ischemic damage in nonperfused brain tissue or add ischemic damage to perfused brain tissue. Conclusions. Under these experimental conditions, ultrasound does not cause additional ischemic damage to the rat brain during middle cerebral artery occlusion.

Key Words: brain • fibrinolysis • ultrasonic tissue effects • ultrasound

Abbreviations: CCA, common carotid artery • ICA, internal carotid artery • ISATA, spatial-average temporal-average intensity • MCA, middle cerebral artery • MCL, method control • TTC, 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride • UCL, ultrasound control




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Pfaffenberger, J. Wojta, and M. Gottsauner-Wolf
High-Frequency Transtemporal Sonothrombolysis
Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1356 - 1357.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.