JUM GE Healthcare
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kratzer, W.
Right arrow Articles by the Roemerstein Study Group
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kratzer, W.
Right arrow Articles by the Roemerstein Study Group,
© 2003 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 22:1155-1161 • 0278-4297

Factors Affecting Liver Size

A Sonographic Survey of 2080 Subjects

Wolfgang Kratzer, MD, Violetta Fritz, MD, Richard A. Mason, MD, Mark M. Haenle, Volker Kaechele, MD and the Roemerstein Study Group

Abteilung Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Wolfgang Kratzer, MD, Abteilung Innere Medizin I, Universität Ulm, Robert-Koch-Strasse 8, 89081 Ulm, Germany. E-mail: wolfgang.kratzer{at}medizin.uni-ulm.de.

Objective. We sought to determine the size of the liver in a nonselected population sample to establish normal and reference values and to study potential factors influencing liver size. Methods. A total of 2080 subjects (983 male and 1097 female; age range, 18–88 years) underwent prospective ultrasound examination to determine the size of the liver. Subjects also underwent physical examination and completed a short standardized interview questionnaire covering potential factors influencing liver size. Data were evaluated descriptively. The influence of multiple variables on liver size was studied by means of a covariance analysis. Results. The average measured liver diameter (midclavicular line) ± SD was 14.0 ± 1.7 cm (median, 13.9 cm; range, 9.4–21.3 cm; average in male subjects, 14.5 ± 1.6 cm; and average in female subjects, 13.5 ± 1.7 cm). Results of the multivariate analysis showed that the factors body mass index, body height, sex, age, and (in male subjects) frequent alcohol consumption exert an influence over liver size measured at the midclavicular line. Conclusions. The sonographic measurement of liver size at the midclavicular line was shown to be an easy and practical method for routine use. Only in 239 (11.5%) of 2080 subjects did the size of the liver measured at the midclavicular line exceed 16 cm. Body mass index and body height are the most important factors associated with the diameter of the liver measured at the midclavicular line.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index • MCL, midclavicular line

Key Words: alcohol • body height • liver • normal value • size • sonography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Trop Med HygHome page
M. S. Hsiang, E. J. Carlton, Y. Zhang, B. Zhong, Q. Dongchuan, P.-A. Cohen, C. C. Stewart, and R. C. Spear
Use of Ultrasonography to Evaluate Schistosoma japonicum-Related Morbidity in Children, Sichuan Province, China, 2000-2007
Am J Trop Med Hyg, January 1, 2010; 82(1): 103 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.