JUM Parker Laboratories, Inc
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forsberg, F.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, B. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forsberg, F.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, B. B.
© 2002 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 21:1003-1013 • 0278-4297

Contrast-Enhanced Transrectal Ultrasonography of a Novel Canine Prostate Cancer Model

Flemming Forsberg, PhD, David K. Johnson, DVM, Daniel A. Merton, BS, RDMS, Ji-Bin Liu, MD, Patricia E. Losco, VMD, Else K. Hagen, MD, PhD and Barry B. Goldberg, MD

Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (F.F., D.A.M., J.-B.L., B.B.G.); Nycomed Amersham, Wayne, Pennsylvania (D.K.J., P.E.L.); and Amersham Health, Oslo, Norway (E.K.H.). Dr Johnson is now with Cascades Biomedical Consultants, Chester Springs, Pennsylvania. Dr Losco is now with Schering-Plough Research Institute, Lafayette, New Jersey.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Flemming Forsberg, PhD, Department of Radiology, Division of Ultrasound, Suite 763J, Main Building, 132 S 10th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

Objective. This study evaluated the utility of a new animal model for prostate cancer imaging using a new ultrasonographic contrast agent (Sonazoid [NC100100]; Amersham Health, Oslo, Norway), for prostate cancer detection. Methods. Twenty-four dogs had a canine transmissible venereal sarcoma cell line injected (50 million cells/mL) directly into the prostate, producing a neoplasm in 15 to 40 days. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed in power Doppler mode on 8 dogs (phase I) and in gray scale phase inversion harmonic imaging mode on 16 animals (including control animals without tumors; phase II). Evaluations were repeated after intravenous injections of the contrast agent (dose, 0.00625–0.20 µL/kg). Histopathologic examination was performed after each study. For the phase II experiments, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. Results. The contrast agent improved visualization of the prostate cancer vascularity and delineation of tumor size and shape in both power Doppler and phase inversion harmonic imaging modes. Canine transmissible venereal sarcoma tumors ranging from 3 x 5 to 40 x 50 mm were detected. The accuracy for detecting the number of prostate tumors increased (in phase II) from 67% to 87% with the addition of the contrast agent. Histopathologic examination confirmed the ultrasonographic findings and revealed typical canine transmissible venereal sarcoma cells infiltrating the prostate with moderate neovascularity. Conclusions. The novel canine tumor model was useful for evaluating ultrasonographic prostate imaging techniques. Improved detection of prostate tumors in dogs was possible with gray scale phase inversion harmonic imaging of the contrast agent. The accuracy of lesion detection increased from 67% to 87%.

Abbreviations: CTVS, canine transmissible venereal sarcoma • PI HI, phase inversion harmonic imaging • TRUS, transrectal ultrasonography

Key Words: animal model • phase inversion harmonic imaging • prostate cancer • ultrasonographic contrast agent







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.