This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Predanic, M. Articles by Pellettieri, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Predanic, M. Articles by Pellettieri, J.

Ultrasonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight

Acquiring Accuracy in Residency

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The New York Flushing Hospital Medical Center, Flushing.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mladen Predanic, MD, MSc, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The New York Flushing Hospital Medical Center, 146-01 45th Ave, Flushing, NY 11355.

Objective. Ultrasonographic imaging is considered an objective means for fetal weight estimation. The goals of this study were to determine the accuracy of ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight performed by residents in training and to ascertain how rapidly the residents gained proficiency in this regard. Methods. A total of 300 ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight and corresponding birth weight were collected and stratified into 4 groups by the level of residents' experience, from level 1 (inexperienced, with <6 months of exposure) to level 4 (advanced experience, with at least 24 months of training). The proportional difference between ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight and birth weight was calculated for each case and grouped according to the level of training of the examiner. The derived data were compared by analysis of variance, linear regression, and ² test. Results. Significant increases in the accuracy of ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight were observed with advancing levels of resident experience (P < .0001). Overall, 30.6% of ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight fell within 5% of birth weight, and 60.6% fell within 10%. Among the least experienced residents (<6 months of training), 49.4% of estimates fell within 10% of birth weight; among those with 6 to 11 months of experience, 53.5% of estimates fell within 10%; among those with 12 to 23 months of experience, 64.1% of estimates fell within 10%; and among the most experienced (24 months), 73.6% of estimates fell within 10%. Conclusions. There is a learning curve for ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight, with a significant decrease in the percent error seen with advancing training among residents, reaching acceptable levels of more than 70% of estimates within 10% of birth weight after 24 months of ultrasonographic experience.

Key Words: estimated fetal weight • residency • ultrasonography

Abbreviations: AC, abdominal circumference • BPD, biparietal diameter • BW, birth weight • EFW, estimates of fetal weight • FL, femur length • uEFW, ultrasonographic estimates of fetal weight

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. C. Frates, C. B. Benson, K. H. Zou, P. M. Doubilet, A. Gerdeman, and C. R. B. Merritt Does Hands-on Obstetric US Experience Improve Performance on the Radiology Oral Board Examination? Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 529 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Durbin, C. W. Lee, and V. G. Parker The Effect of Amniotic Fluid Index on the Accuracy of Sonographic Estimated Fetal Weight Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, July 1, 2005; 21(4): 329 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF]