JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norén, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rosfors, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norén, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rosfors, S.
© 2002 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 21:1375-1383 • 0278-4297

A Detailed Analysis of Equivocal Duplex Findings in Patients With Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis

Anders Norén, MD, Eva Ottosson, MD, PhD, Maggie Sjunnesson, MD and Stefan Rosfors, MD, PhD

Karolinska Institutet, Departments of Clinical Physiology (A.N., S.R.), Internal Medicine (E.O.), and Diagnostic Radiology (M.S.), Stockholm Söder Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Stefan Rosfors, Department of Clinical Physiology, Stockholm Söder Hospital, S-118 83 Stockholm, Sweden.

Objective. To analyze equivocal duplex findings in patients with clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis and thus to increase the diagnostic utility of color duplex sonography in this category of patients. Methods. Phlebography was requested in a series of 102 consecutive patients with inconclusive duplex findings. These patients were, according to the duplex findings only, subdivided into having low, intermediate, and high probability of deep venous thrombosis. Results. Phlebography was attempted in 71 cases and successfully performed in 49. The remaining 53 patients were prospectively followed clinically for 6 months. Phlebography showed deep venous thrombosis in 1 of 63 patients in the group with low probability, 3 of 31 in the intermediate group, and all of the 8 patients with high probability. Twenty-two (31%) of the 71 attempted phlebographic examinations were nondiagnostic. None of the patients in the follow-up group had any thromboembolic complications. Conclusions. Even if a duplex examination is equivocal, it is still possible to extract clinically useful information by categorizing the duplex results into subgroups with low, intermediate, and high probability of deep venous thrombosis. This can have implications for the diagnostic or therapeutic handling of these patients and thus can increase the utility of sonography in patients with inconclusive duplex findings.

Key Words: deep venous thrombosis • diagnostic methods • phlebography • sonography

Abbreviations: DVT, deep venous thrombosis • LR, likelihood ratio

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.