JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bodner, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gruber, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bodner, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gruber, H.
© 2002 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
J Ultrasound Med 21:1289-1293 • 0278-4297


Case Series

Ultrasonographic Appearance of Supinator Syndrome

Gerd Bodner, MD, Christoph Harpf, MD, Romed Meirer, MD, Alexander Gardetto, MD, Peter Kovacs, MD and Hannes Gruber, MD

Departments of Radiology (G.B., P.K., H.G.) and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (C.H., R.M., A.G.), University Hospital Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Gerd Bodner, MD, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Objective. To describe ultrasonographic findings in 4 patients with supinator syndrome (i.e., deep branch of the radial nerve). Methods. Four patients with weakness and pain in their forearm underwent ultrasonographic examination with subsequent electroneurographic testing and surgical nerve inspection. Normal measurements of the deep branch of the radial nerve in 10 healthy volunteers served as comparison for measurements in the patients. Results. An enlarged deep branch of the radial nerve was found in all 4 patients at the affected side. Electroneurographic testing and surgical inspection confirmed the ultrasonographic findings. The mean transverse diameter was 4.2 mm (range, 3.8–4.5 mm), and the anteroposterior diameter was 3.3 mm (range, 2.5–3.8 mm). In volunteers, the mean transverse diameter was 2.13 mm (range, 1.7–2.6 mm), and the mean anteroposterior diameter was 1.3 mm (range, 1.0–1.5 mm). Conclusions. The deep branch of the radial nerve appears enlarged in patients with supinator syndrome.

Key Words: peripheric nerve • radial nerve • supinator syndrome • ultrasonography

Abbreviations: DBRN, deep branch of the radial nerve • SBRN, superficial branch of the radial nerve




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
K. Nakamichi and S. Tachibana
Ultrasonographic Findings in Isolated Neuritis of the Posterior Interosseous Nerve: Comparison With Normal Findings
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2007; 26(5): 683 - 687.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. Rossey-Marec, J. Simonet, R. Beccari, C. Michot, P. Bencteux, J. N. Dacher, P.-Y. Milliez, and J. Thiebot
Ultrasonographic Appearance of Idiopathic Radial Nerve Constriction Proximal to the Elbow
J. Ultrasound Med., July 1, 2004; 23(7): 1003 - 1007.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Shafighi, R. Gurunluoglu, M. Ninkovic, A. Mallouhi, and G. Bodner
Ultrasonography for Depiction of Brachial Plexus Injury
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2003; 22(6): 631 - 634.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.