JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoonjans, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brem, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoonjans, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brem, R. F.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 20, Issue 9 967-972, Copyright © 2001 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses

J. M. Schoonjans and R. F. Brem
Department of Radiology, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20037, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Large-core needle biopsy of the breast can be performed with stereotactic or ultrasonographic guidance. However, ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy has notable advantages, including the absence of ionizing radiation, increased patient comfort, and greater cost-effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of breast cancer in palpable and nonpalpable breast masses. METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of consecutive ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsies for indeterminate breast masses. A total 424 ultrasonographically guided core biopsies were performed in 367 patients with 1 or more breast masses. Ultrasonographically guided core biopsy was performed with a 14-gauge spring-loaded needle and a freehand technique. Correlation of ultrasonographically guided core biopsy pathologic findings with subsequent surgical pathologic findings or long-term imaging follow-up was performed. RESULTS: Of 424 indeterminate breast lesions for which histopathologic findings were obtained by ultrasonographically guided core biopsy, 234 cancers were diagnosed. Twenty-eight additional lesions had either questionable but not definitively malignant pathologic features (n = 11) or radiologic-pathologic discordance (n = 17) and were surgically excised. Of these, 8 additional cancers were diagnosed. Patients or surgeons chose excision of 41 additional lesions that were benign on ultrasonographically guided core biopsy No cancer was found in these surgical specimens. One additional cancer was diagnosed at a 6-month imaging follow-up because of interval growth. On the basis of surgical and long-term imaging follow-up, the sensitivity of ultrasonographically guided core biopsy for the diagnosis of breast carcinoma was 99.2% (95% confidence interval, 95.6%-99.9%) in 173 palpable breast masses and 93.2% (95% confidence interval, 87.1%-97%) in 251 nonpalpable masses. In cancers diagnosed on the basis of immediate surgical excision as a result of ultrasonographically guided core biopsy that showed either questionable pathologic features or radiologic-pathologic discordance, the sensitivity of ultrasonographically guided core biopsy for the diagnosis of breast cancer was 99.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy is a sensitive percutaneous biopsy method for the diagnosis of breast cancer in palpable and nonpalpable breast masses.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Youk, E.-K. Kim, M. J. Kim, and K. K. Oh
Sonographically Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy of Breast Masses: A Review of 2,420 Cases with Long-Term Follow-Up
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 202 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. H. Youk, E.-K. Kim, M. J. Kim, J. Y. Lee, and K. K. Oh
Missed Breast Cancers at US-guided Core Needle Biopsy: How to Reduce Them
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2007; 27(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. F. Brem, J. A. Rapelyea, G. Zisman, K. Mohtashemi, J. Raub, C. B. Teal, S. Majewski, and B. L. Welch
Occult Breast Cancer: Scintimammography with High-Resolution Breast-specific Gamma Camera in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 274 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. M. Golub, C. L. Bennett, T. Stinson, L. Venta, and M. Morrow
Cost Minimization Study of Image-Guided Core Biopsy Versus Surgical Excisional Biopsy for Women With Abnormal Mammograms
J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2004; 22(12): 2430 - 2437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
I. K. Komenaka, M. El-Tamer, E. Pile-Spellman, and H. Hibshoosh
Core Needle Biopsy as a Diagnostic Tool to Differentiate Phyllodes Tumor From Fibroadenoma
Arch Surg, September 1, 2003; 138(9): 987 - 990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.