JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zalel, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Goldenberg, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zalel, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Goldenberg, M.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 20, Issue 8 877-881, Copyright © 2001 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sonohysterography for the diagnosis of residual trophoblastic tissue

Y. Zalel, S. B. Cohen, M. Oren, D. S. Seidman, M. Zolti, R. Achiron and M. Goldenberg
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and associated complications of sonohysterography for the diagnosis of residual trophoblastic tissue. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 23 consecutive patients admitted to our ultrasonography unit with clinical and ultrasonographic signs of retained intrauterine tissue. RESULTS: Twelve patients had hydrosonographic features suggestive of residual trophoblastic tissue (i.e., an intrauterine lesion not detachable from the uterine wall after instillation of saline), whereas in 11 cases the hydrosonographic findings were negative for retained tissue. Blood flow was detected within abnormal intrauterine masses in 4 of 12 patients with trophoblastic tissue, whereas it was not detected in any patient without retained tissue (P = .093). No complications were encountered during the procedure or the postprocedure period. None of the patients had anesthetic complications, perforation of the uterus, fluid overload, or any other surgical complication. All 12 patients underwent hysteroscopic removal of the suspected residual trophoblastic tissue, and histologic confirmation of residual trophoblastic tissue was obtained in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Sonohysterography for detection and diagnosis of residual trophoblastic tissue is an accurate and safe procedure. Further studies comparing the efficacy of sonohysterography with that of diagnostic hysteroscopy are warranted.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
I. Ben-Ami, D. Schneider, R. Maymon, Z. Vaknin, A. Herman, and R. Halperin
Sonographic versus clinical evaluation as predictors of residual trophoblastic tissue
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 1107 - 1111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Maslovitz, B. Almog, G. Sheffer Mimouni, A. Jaffa, J. B. Lessing, and A. Many
Accuracy of Diagnosis of Retained Products of Conception After Dilation and Evacuation
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2004; 23(6): 749 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. B. Noonan, F. V. Coakley, A. Qayyum, B. M. Yeh, L. Wu, and L.-m. Chen
MR Imaging of Retained Products of Conception
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 435 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Obstet GynecolHome page
G. L. Ryan, T. J. Quinn, C. H. Syrop, and W. F. Hansen
Placenta Accreta Postpartum
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2002; 100(5): 1069 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.