JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gentles, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Greene, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gentles, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Greene, E. R.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 20, Issue 4 365-370, Copyright © 2001 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cardiac output measurements in congenital heart disease: validation of a simple, portable Doppler method

T. L. Gentles, J. M. Neutze, A. L. Caulder and E. R. Greene
Department of Cardiology, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Noninvasive Doppler cardiac output measurements are clinical standards in adults and children. Presently, these standard Doppler methods generally require relatively expensive and large imaging equipment with complex signal-processing techniques. Thus, universal access to these important measurements has been limited. Simple, portable Doppler methods have been validated previously and applied to infants and children without cardiac disease. Nevertheless, these specific, inexpensive techniques have not been validated in children with complex congenital heart disease. Accordingly, we compared a noninvasive, suprasternal, non-image-guided, pulsed Doppler cardiac output with standard invasive Fick cardiac outputs in 20 patients (age range, 1 month to 15 years) with congenital heart disease. Doppler cardiac output was displayed by multiplying the mean velocity with an operator-selected angiographic or echographic estimate of the aortic diameter. The values from linear regression analysis were r = 0.96; Doppler cardiac output = 0.98 x Fick cardiac output - 0.08 L/min (range, 0.55-3.10 L/min). The 95% confidence limits were less than 35% of the mean of Doppler and Fick cardiac outputs across the range of measurements. We conclude that relatively linear and accurate measurements of cardiac output can be made by this simple, inexpensive, portable method in selected infants and children with various forms of congenital heart disease.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.