JUM Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thickman, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Goldenberg, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thickman, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Goldenberg, N. J.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 2, Issue 3 117-121, Copyright © 1983 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of display format on detectability

D. I. Thickman, M. C. Ziskin and N. J. Goldenberg

The effects of black-echo (black dots on white background) and white-echo (white dots on black background) display formats on detectability of a wire embedded in an echogenic test object were compared. Trained observers were asked to note the presence or absence of the wire on a randomized series of 528 B scans (264 black-echo and 264 white-echo images), half of which contained a wire. The scans not containing a wire were used as controls. The specificity of the white-echo display (75 per cent) exceeded that of the black-echo display (54 per cent), with statistical significance at the 99 per cent confidence level. There was no measurable difference in sensitivity. These results are explained in terms of principles of visual physiology.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.