JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Manning, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Manning, F. A.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 2, Issue 3 113-116, Copyright © 1983 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Estimation of volume and weight of the perinate: relationship to morphometric measurement by ultrasonography

T. R. Thompson and F. A. Manning

A method of determining fetal weight in utero was developed by use of real-time ultrasonography. A volume model representing trunk and limbs as cylinders with dimensions related to morphometric parameters was tested on 60 neonates. Head volumes in these 60 neonates were determined from equations relating head morphometric measures to head volume in 30 neonatal autopsy specimens. Head density and trunk and limb density were determined separately on the 60 neonates by study of the variation in overall density with body proportions. From these density and volume values, total body mass was estimated. The deviation of neonatal weight estimates from actual weights at three days postpartum was +/- 4.1 per cent (1 SD). The validity of this method for fetal weight determination was tested by in utero ultrasonographic measurement of 31 fetuses before delivery by cesarean section. The deviation of the weight estimate from the actual weight at three days postpartum was +/- 8.1 per cent (1 SD), or +/- 7.4 per cent (absolute mean error).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Predanic, A. Cho, F. Ingrid, and J. Pellettieri
Ultrasonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight: Acquiring Accuracy in Residency
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2002; 21(5): 495 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
T. J. DuBose
Fetal Biometry: Vertical Calvarial Diameter and Calvarial Volume
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, September 1, 1985; 1(5): 205 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1983 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.