JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salerno, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salerno, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, T. R.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 19, Issue 8 549-555, Copyright © 2000 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


CLINICAL TRIAL

Three-dimensional ultrasonographic imaging of the neonatal brain in high-risk neonates: preliminary study

C. C. Salerno, D. H. Pretorius, S. W. Hilton, M. K. O'Boyle, A. D. Hull, G. M. James, M. Riccabona, F. Mannino, A. Craft and T. R. Nelson
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, USA.

The aim of this investigation was to compare the utility of three-dimensional ultrasonography versus two-dimensional ultrasonography in imaging the neonatal brain. Thirty patients in the neonatal intensive care unit underwent two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography. The resultant two- and three-dimensional images recorded on film and three-dimensional volumes (reviewed on a workstation) were evaluated independently. Comparable numbers of normal and abnormal studies were diagnosed by each modality. Axial images were considered useful in approximately 50% of three-dimensional cases. Image quality, overall and in the far-field, was rated higher on two-dimensional images. Three-dimensional sonographic acquisition time in the neonatal intensive care unit (1.7 min+/-0.7 standard deviation) was significantly shorter than that for two-dimensional sonography (9.0+/-4.5 min). The total time for evaluation on the three-dimensional workstation (4.4+/-1.1 min) was significantly less than that for two-dimensional images on film (10.6+/-4.7 min). In conclusion, three-dimensional ultrasonography is a promising, diagnostically accurate, and efficient imaging tool for evaluation of the neonatal brain; however, visualization must improve before it can replace two-dimensional ultrasonography.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Riccabona, A. Pilhatsch, A. Haberlik, and E. Ring
Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography-Based Virtual Cystoscopy of the Pediatric Urinary Bladder: A Preliminary Report on Feasibility and Potential Value
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2008; 27(10): 1453 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Riccabona, G. A. Fritz, H. Schollnast, T. Schwarz, M. J. Deutschmann, and C. J. Mache
Hydronephrotic Kidney: Pediatric Three-dimensional US for Relative Renal Size Assessment--Initial Experience
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 276 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.