JUM Parker Laboratories, Inc
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoonjans, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brem, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoonjans, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brem, R. F.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 19, Issue 7 449-457, Copyright © 2000 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sonographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with ultrasonographically guided large core needle biopsy: correlation with mammographic and pathologic findings

J. M. Schoonjans and R. F. Brem
The Breast Imaging and Interventional Center, Russel H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiologic Science, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate sonographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed percutaneously at ultrasonographically guided large core needle biopsy. Of 619 biopsies, 203 breast carcinomas were diagnosed, of which nine were pure ductal carcinoma in situ. All ductal carcinoma in situ lesions appeared sonographically as hypoechoic masses without a pseudocapsule. Grade 1 lesions (n = 2; mean size, 9.5 mm), grade 2 lesions (n = 4; mean size, 18 mm) and grade 3 lesions (n = 3; mean size, 32 mm) had means of 0, 1, and 5 malignant sonographic features, respectively. Ductal carcinoma in situ appeared mammographically as a mass, with two of four grade 2 lesions and all grade 3 lesions demonstrating suspicious microcalcifications. One grade 3 ductal carcinoma in situ was spiculated. In conclusion, ductal carcinoma in situ lesions tended to show more malignant mammographic and sonographic features as histologic grade and size increased.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. J. Shin, H. H. Kim, S. M. Kim, G. Y. Kwon, G. Gong, and O. K. Cho
Screening-Detected and Symptomatic Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Differences in the Sonographic and Pathologic Features
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 516 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. F. Stein, G. Zisman, J. A. Rapelyea, A. M. Schwartz, B. Abell, and R. F. Brem
Lobular Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast Presenting as a Mass
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1799 - 1801.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. T. Yang and G. M. K. Tse
Sonographic, Mammographic, and Histopathologic Correlation of Symptomatic Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 101 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. K. Moon, D.-Y. Noh, and J.-G. Im
Multifocal, Multicentric, and Contralateral Breast Cancers: Bilateral Whole-Breast US in the Preoperative Evaluation of Patients
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 569 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
W. K. Moon, J. S. Myung, Y. J. Lee, I. A. Park, D.-Y. Noh, and J.-G. Im
US of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 269 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.