JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bude, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Tuthill, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bude, R. O.
Right arrow Articles by Tuthill, T.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 19, Issue 6 391-398, Copyright © 2000 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of spectacular reflection on out-of-plane ultrasonographic images reconstructed from three-dimensional data sets

R. O. Bude and T. Tuthill
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0030, USA.

The effect of specular reflection on ultrasonographic images reconstructed out of plane to the plane of acquisition of a three-dimensional volumetric data set was studied using two in vitro phantoms that incorporated structures exhibiting specular reflection. The phantoms were scanned transversely (axially) to form three-dimensional data sets, with coronal cross-sectional images reconstructed perpendicular to the plane of acquisition of the data sets. Directly scanned, nonreconstructed coronal images of the phantoms also were obtained in the same planes and from the same areas as the reconstructed coronal images. The direct and reconstructed coronal images were compared. Owing to the inherent directionality of specular reflectors, the reconstructed coronal images differed from the directly scanned images in two ways, containing some hyperechoic regions that were not present at direct coronal scanning and failing to contain other hyperechoic areas that were present at direct coronal imaging. We conclude that sonographic images reformatted from volumetric data sets may have a different appearance than images scanned directly in the same plane, independent of other factors such as resolution. This should be taken into account when such reformatted images are interpreted.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.