JUM GE Healthcare
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tublin, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tublin, M. E.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 19, Issue 5 303-314, Copyright © 2000 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Understanding the Doppler RI: impact of renal arterial distensibility on the RI in a hydronephrotic ex vivo rabbit kidney model

M. E. Murphy and M. E. Tublin
Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, The Albany Medical Center, New York, USA.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of elevated ureteral pressure on renal arterial distention, and thereby on the Doppler resistive index. Seven isolated rabbit kidneys were subjected to a pulsatile perfusion while the renal pelvis was pressurized via the ureter. Renal vascular pressure, flow, resistance (pressure/flow) and conductance (flow/pressure) were compared to simultaneous resistive index measurements using linear regression analysis. Changes in the Conductance Index (systolic conductance - diastolic conductance/systolic conductance) were likewise compared to the resistive index. Elevations in ureteral pressure were significantly correlated with (1) increased resistive index values, (2) increased mean renal vascular resistance, (3) decreased mean conductance, and (4) increased conductance index values (for all correlations P < 0.05). The increases in the resistive index correlated significantly with increases in the conductance index. This study shows that elevated ureteral pressure, likely acting via interstitial pressure, diminishes the conductance of the renal vascular bed. Because this effect is more dramatic at diastole, the cyclic patterns of flow are altered, resulting in elevated resistive index values. The results indicate the importance of the interaction between vascular distensibility and pulsatile flow, rather than overall mean renal vascular resistance, in determining resistive index values.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
T. Uzu, Y. Kida, N. Shirahashi, T. Harada, A. Yamauchi, M. Nomura, K. Isshiki, S.-i. Araki, T. Sugimoto, D. Koya, et al.
Cerebral Microvascular Disease Predicts Renal Failure in Type 2 Diabetes
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2010; 21(3): 520 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
C. Parolini, A. Noce, E. Staffolani, G. F. Giarrizzo, S. Costanzi, and G. Splendiani
Renal Resistive Index and Long-term Outcome in Chronic Nephropathies
Radiology, September 1, 2009; 252(3): 888 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. H. Heine, B. Reichart, C. Ulrich, H. Kohler, and M. Girndt
Do ultrasound renal resistance indices reflect systemic rather than renal vascular damage in chronic kidney disease?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 163 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Gurel, D. Akata, K. Gurel, M. N. Ozmen, and O. Akhan
Correlation Between the Renal Resistive Index (RI) and Nonenhanced Computed Tomography in Acute Renal Colic: How Reliable Is the RI in Distinguishing Obstruction?
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2006; 25(9): 1113 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt
The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.