JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bromley, B.
Right arrow Articles by Benacerraf, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bromley, B.
Right arrow Articles by Benacerraf, B. R.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 18, Issue 8 523-528, Copyright © 1999 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Genetic sonogram scoring index: accuracy and clinical utility

B. Bromley, T. Shipp and B. R. Benacerraf
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

We sought to evaluate the accuracy of the genetic sonogram scoring index in detecting Down syndrome fetuses in a high-risk population. Women referred for genetic sonogram scoring index based on increased risk for aneuploidy were prospectively evaluated. Each fetus was assigned a score based on our previously published genetic sonogram scoring index. A score of 1 or greater was an indication for karyotype determination. Of 1076 patients (1118 fetuses) in the study group, follow-up data were available for 1030 (92%), eight of whom had Down syndrome (prevalence 0.8%). Three fetuses with Down syndrome had a genetic sonogram scoring index of 0, and for one of these the mother was 42 years old. One affected fetus had a score of 1 and the other four had scores of 2 or greater. Using a genetic sonogram scoring index of 1 or greater (age not considered), five of eight fetuses with Down syndrome (62.5%) were identified, as well as 150 of 1030 (14.6%) of normals. Down syndrome was undetected in three fetuses of 1030 (1 in 343) or 0.29%. In addition, when all women 40 years old or older underwent karyotype testing regardless of their sonographic findings, six of eight Down syndrome fetuses were identified (75%), as well as 271 of 1030 (26.3%) of normals. The number of cases of Down syndrome not detected was two in 1030 (1 in 515) or 0.19%. In conclusion, the genetic sonogram scoring index was used to identify approximately 75% of fetuses with Down syndrome, with amniocentesis being recommended in 26.7% of a high-risk population.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
G. R. DeVore and R. Romero
Genetic Sonography: An Option for Women of Advanced Maternal Age With Negative Triple-Marker Maternal Serum Screening Results
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2003; 22(11): 1191 - 1199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. Yeo, E. R. Guzman, C. V. Ananth, C. Walters, D. Day-Salvatore, and A. M. Vintzileos
Prenatal Detection of Fetal Aneuploidy by Sonographic Ear Length
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2003; 22(6): 565 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. Bromley, E. Lieberman, T. D. Shipp, and B. R. Benacerraf
The Genetic Sonogram: A Method of Risk Assessment for Down Syndrome in the Second Trimester
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2002; 21(10): 1087 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.