JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleischer, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleischer, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, B.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 18, Issue 7 503-512, Copyright © 1999 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


CLINICAL TRIAL

Sonographic assessment of the endometrium in osteopenic postmenopausal women treated with idoxifene

A. C. Fleischer, J. E. Wheeler, I. T. Yeh, B. Kravitz, C. Jensen and B. MacDonald
Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2675, USA.

Idoxifene is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator that has shown beneficial effects on bone turnover and lipid metabolism in clinical studies. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that idoxifene has estrogen antagonist activities on the endometrium. This paper describes the results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, and dose ranging study involving 331 osteopenic postmenopausal women who were treated with either placebo or idoxifene (2.5, 5, or 10 mg/day) for 12 weeks. In these women, endometrial assessment was carried out by transvaginal sonography and endometrial biopsy on selected patients at baseline and on all women at the end of treatment. Women with an endometrial thickness greater than 10 mm were excluded from the study. Aspiration endometrial biopsy was performed on women with an endometrial thickness between 6 and 10 mm at baseline and on all women after treatment. Of the 298 biopsies performed in the subjects at the end of treatment, 99% of the women were reported to have either a benign or atrophic endometrium (85%) or insufficient tissue for diagnosis (14%). Proliferative histologic features were reported in two cases (1%) (2.5 mg idoxifene) and atypical hyperplasia in one placebo patient. Even though idoxifene use was associated with a dose related increase in endometrial thickness as evaluated by transvaginal sonography, no relationship was established between endometrial histologic features and change in endometrial thickness. On histologic analysis, the increase in endometrial thickness seen on transvaginal sonography was not associated with proliferative or hyperplastic change in the epithelial (glandular) endometrial tissue. In 48 patients (16% of total) transvaginal sonography showed endometrial thickening of 5 mm or more over the study period. The endometrial histologic features were benign in all these patients. Nineteen percent of women developed intraluminal fluid, even though endometrial thickness was normal and unchanged and histologic features were normal. Our data show that after 3 months of treatment, no significant pathologic changes of the endometrium were observed. Our data indicate that measurements of endometrial thickness by transvaginal sonography may falsely suggest the presence of endometrial pathologic changes in some postmenopausal women treated with idoxifene. Additional testing using saline infusion sonohysterography is an important part of the transvaginal sonography protocol in equivocal or abnormal cases to exclude focal lesions such as polyps. In addition, our data indicate that pathologic changes of the endometrium are extremely rare in the treated group, indicative of its short term safety. Continued investigation such as this will be needed to establish long term safety.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
N. Chabbert-Buffet, G. Meduri, P. Bouchard, and I. M. Spitz
Selective progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists: mechanisms of action and clinical applications
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2005; 11(3): 293 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Arpino, M. Nair Krishnan, C. Doval Dinesh, V. J. Bardou, G. M. Clark, and R. M. Elledge
Idoxifene versus tamoxifen: a randomized comparison in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2003; 14(2): 233 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. M. Cline, G. Soderqvist, T. C. Register, J. K. Williams, M. R. Adams, and B. Von Schoultz
Assessment of Hormonally Active Agents in the Reproductive Tract of Female Nonhuman Primates
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2001; 29(1): 84 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Bredella, V. A. Feldstein, R. A. Filly, R. B. Goldstein, P. W. Callen, and H. K. Genant
Measurement of Endometrial Thickness at US in Multicenter Drug Trials: Value of Central Quality Assurance Reading
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 516 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.