JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vade, A.
Right arrow Articles by Subbaiah, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vade, A.
Right arrow Articles by Subbaiah, P.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 18, Issue 5 357-361, Copyright © 1999 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Resistive indices in the evaluation of infants with obstructive and nonobstructive pyelocaliectasis

A. Vade, C. Dudiak, P. McCarthy, D. A. Hatch and P. Subbaiah
Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.

Diagnosing obstructive uropathy by renal resistive indices calculated from duplex Doppler sonographic waveforms has been supported as well as challenged in the radiology literature relating to adults. Despite reports of normally higher resistive indices in children as compared to adults, two studies have documented high sensitivity and specificity of renal Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of obstructive uropathy in children, using the same discriminatory criterion of a resistive index of 0.7 or greater as used in adults. We evaluated 43 infants with significant or bilateral pyelocaliectasis secondary to both obstructive and unobstructive uropathy and found no significant difference in the mean resistive indices or the mean difference in resistive indices of two kidneys in one patient. We conclude that Doppler sonography in infants has no value in differentiating obstructive from nonobstructive pyelocaliectasis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt
The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.