JUM etoc signup
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lin, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Teefey, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lin, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Teefey, S. A.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 18, Issue 2 147-152, Copyright © 1999 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Extended field of view sonography in musculoskeletal imaging

E. C. Lin, W. D. Middleton and S. A. Teefey
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

The usage patterns and benefits of extended field of view sonography were analyzed prospectively in 100 consecutive musculoskeletal ultrasonographic examinations. Extended field of view sonography was used in 23 of 58 abnormal cases (10 of 41 shoulders, five of eight other joints, seven of seven extra-articular extremities, one of two interventional procedures) and two of 42 normal cases. Of 23 abnormal cases using extended field of view sonography (12 of 46 tendon tears and 11 of 12 fluid collections or masses), this modality helped in measuring abnormalities in 13, displaying abnormalities in 19, showing spatial relationships in 17, communicating findings in 13, and making diagnoses in 0. Extended field of view is a useful technique for musculoskeletal ultrasonography. The primary benefits are measuring and displaying abnormalities (most often fluid collections or masses and extra-articular extremity abnormalities).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
A. T. Turgut, Z. U. Coskun, E. Ergun, P. Kosar, P. O. Geyik, S. Gorar, and U. Kosar
Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Sonographic Measurement of the Size of the Thyroid Gland by Extended Field-of-View Sonography
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, May 1, 2008; 24(3): 147 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. C. Kavanagh, G. Koulouris, L. Parker, W. B. Morrison, D. Bergin, A. C. Zoga, J. A. Dlugosz, and L. N. Nazarian
Does Extended-Field-of-View Sonography Improve Interrater Reliability for the Detection of Rotator Cuff Muscle Atrophy?
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 27 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
D. B. Weiss, J. A. Jacobson, and M. A. Karunakar
The Use of Ultrasound in Evaluating Orthopaedic Trauma Patients
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., December 1, 2005; 13(8): 525 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. H. Kim, B. I. Choi, K. W. Kim, K. H. Lee, and J. K. Han
Extended Field-of-View Sonography: Advantages in Abdominal Applications
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2003; 22(4): 385 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
R S D Campbell and J Wood
Ultrasound of muscle
Imaging, June 1, 2002; 14(3): 229 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Lin, J. A. Jacobson, D. P. Fessell, W. J. Weadock, and C. W. Hayes
An Illustrated Tutorial of Musculoskeletal Sonography: Part 4, Musculoskeletal Masses, Sonographically Guided Interventions, and Miscellaneous Topics
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1711 - 1719.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Lin, D. P. Fessell, J. A. Jacobson, W. J. Weadock, and C. W. Hayes
An Illustrated Tutorial of Musculoskeletal Sonography: Part I, Introduction and General Principles
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 637 - 645.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.