JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by McArdle, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by McArdle, C. R.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 18, Issue 2 117-122, Copyright © 1999 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Lack of sensitivity of endometrial thickness in predicting the presence of an ectopic pregnancy

T. S. Mehta, D. Levine and C. R. McArdle
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether endometrial thickness measurements can be used to differentiate between patients with ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous abortion. Of 676 patients with clinical suspicion of ectopic pregnancy, no intrauterine pregnancy was seen in 128. Of these, 42 (33%) had ectopic pregnancy, 52 (40%) had spontaneous abortion, and 34 (27%) had intrauterine pregnancy. No significant difference was found in endometrial thickness between women with ectopic pregnancy (mean, 9.0 mm; range, 2 to 20 mm) and those with spontaneous abortion (mean, 8.4 mm; range, 2 to 18 mm). A thin endometrium seen on transvaginal sonography cannot be used to exclude the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.