JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertolotto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lissiani, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertolotto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Lissiani, A.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 18, Issue 12 819-825, Copyright © 1999 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Changes of renal resistive index in response to hydration and diuretic administration in normal subjects and in patients with small ureteral stone

M. Bertolotto, U. Moro, E. Gioulis, C. Lodolo and A. Lissiani
Department of Radiology, University of Trieste, Italy.

The renal resistive index has been measured before and after hydration and administration of diuretics in persons with normal kidneys and in kidneys with small ureteral stone, either obstructing or nonobstructing, to assess induced flow changes and to identify features differentiating obstructing from nonobstructing stones. In normal kidneys the resistive index was normal (mean, 0.62+/-0.03); no changes in the resistive index occurred within 15 to 60 min after hydration alone, whereas the resistive index rose within 15 min after hydration plus administration of diuretics and then returned to initial values within 30 min. In both cases the resistive index decreased below basal values after 75 to 90 min. Similar changes were observed in kidneys with a nonobstructing ureteral stone. In kidneys with an obstructing ureteral stone the resistive index was higher than in normal subjects (mean, 0.73+/-0.02, P<0.01), increased further within 15 min after hydration and administration of diuretics (P<0.01), and remained higher than basal values during the following 90 min. In conclusion, different resistive index changes have been observed in response to hydration and diuretics in normal and obstructed kidneys. Duplex Doppler sonography and diuresis duplex Doppler sonography seem promising diagnostic tools to identify obstructing stones.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Tublin, R. O. Bude, and J. F. Platt
The Resistive Index in Renal Doppler Sonography: Where Do We Stand?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 885 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.