JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carstensen, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Christopher, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carstensen, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Christopher, T.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 18, Issue 1 69-80, Copyright © 1999 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Nonlinear propagation and the output indices

E. L. Carstensen, D. Dalecki, S. M. Gracewski and T. Christopher
Department of Electrical, Engineering, The Rochester Center for Biomedical Ultrasound, The University of Rochester, New York 14627, USA.

By ignoring the effects of nonlinear propagation, current exposimetry protocols may yield significant underestimates of the acoustic pressure in situ. This problem can be avoided simply by (1) extrapolating pressures linearly from low amplitude measurements in water and (2) linearly derating these values to obtain estimates of fields in situ. The mechanical index was designed to provide an indication of temporal peak acoustic fields for use in prediction of nonthermal biological effects in tissues. At low outputs, the mechanical index, together with the frequency, gives the peak negative pressure near the focus of the field. As currently formulated, however, the pressure used in the mechanical index may be far from the focus at high output levels. Recommendations of the World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology avoid the underestimate associated with nonlinear propagation as well as other problems with the mechanical index and may be preferable in dealing with non-thermal bioeffects. The thermal indices that are implemented currently in the Output Display Standard (American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine/National Electrical Manufacturers' Association) are affected less seriously by nonlinear propagation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. S. Abramowicz, S. B. Barnett, F. A. Duck, P. D. Edmonds, K. H. Hynynen, and M. C. Ziskin
Fetal Thermal Effects of Diagnostic Ultrasound
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2008; 27(4): 541 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
T. A. Stiles, E. L. Madsen, G. R. Frank, T. Diehl, and J. A. Lucey
Tissue-Mimicking Liquid for Use in Exposimetry
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 501 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.