JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonilla-Musoles, F.
Right arrow Articles by Osborne, N. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonilla-Musoles, F.
Right arrow Articles by Osborne, N. G.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 17, Issue 7 419-425, Copyright © 1998 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

First-trimester neck abnormalities: three-dimensional evaluation

F. Bonilla-Musoles, F. Raga, A. Villalobos, J. Blanes and N. G. Osborne
Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valencia, Spain.

In order to study the first trimester ultrasonographic differences between nuchal translucency and hygroma colli, we rescanned 25 fetuses (13 with nuchal translucency and 12 with hygroma colli) using transvaginal and three-dimensional ultrasonography, after obtaining a fetal karyotype report. Our objective was to test the premise that the different physiopathologic mechanisms of both processes would be reflected in detectable sonographic differences. Our retrospective analysis showed that the most striking ultrasonographic difference was the presence of bullae as well as greater irregularity, extent, and amplitude of the membrane in cases of hygroma colli. Fetuses with simple nuchal translucency had a more homogeneous linear membrane. Although detailed analysis was impossible in 30% of cases, we found three-dimensional ultrasonography to be a useful technique for establishing the differences between these two entities.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. F. Goncalves, W. Lee, J. Espinoza, and R. Romero
Three- and 4-Dimensional Ultrasound in Obstetric Practice: Does It Help?
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2005; 24(12): 1599 - 1624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
A. Kurjak, S. Kupesic, and M. Kos
Three-Dimensional Sonography for Assessment of Morphology and Vascularization of the Fetus and Placenta
Reproductive Sciences, July 1, 2002; 9(4): 186 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G D Michailidis, P Papageorgiou, and D L Economides
Assessment of fetal anatomy in the first trimester using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2002; 75(891): 215 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.