JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gutberlet, M.
Right arrow Articles by Felix, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gutberlet, M.
Right arrow Articles by Felix, R.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 17, Issue 2 97-102, Copyright © 1998 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Do ultrasonic contrast agents artificially increase maximum Doppler shift? In vivo study of human common carotid arteries

M. Gutberlet, S. Venz, W. Zendel, N. Hosten and R. Felix
Charite-Virchow-Klinikum, Medizinische Fakultat der Humboldt-Universitat Berlin, Germany.

The aim of this study was to establish whether an increase of maximum Doppler shift occurs in the human common carotid artery after the administration of Levovist, an ultrasonographic echo enhancer. Twenty common carotid arteries of 10 patients were examined. Spectral Doppler waveform examinations were performed before and after administration of Levovist using an Acuson 128 XP 10 and a 7.0 MHz transducer probe. Time averaged mean velocity, peak velocity, maximum Doppler shift, and spectral Doppler indices (pulsatility index, resistive index, systolic-diastolic ratio) were assessed. No significant changes in any of the measured parameters, including maximum Doppler shifts, peak velocity (P = 0.35, Wilcoxon rank sum test), pulsatility indices (P = 0.70), resistive indices (P = 0.98), or other spectral indices, were found. We conclude that an increase in Doppler shift does not inevitably occur after the administration of a signal enhancer when examining the human common carotid artery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Kono, S. P. Pinnell, C. B. Sirlin, S. R. Sparks, B. Georgy, W. Wong, and R. F. Mattrey
Carotid Arteries: Contrast-enhanced US Angiography--Preliminary Clinical Experience
Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 561 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H. G. Khan, P. Gailloud, R. O. Bude, J.-B. Martin, K. T. Szopinski, C. Khaw, D. A. Rüfenacht, and K. J. Murphy
The Effect of Contrast Material on Transcranial Doppler Evaluation of Normal Middle Cerebral Artery Peak Systolic Velocity
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2000; 21(2): 386 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. W. Droste, R. Jurgens, D. G. Nabavi, G. Schuierer, S. Weber, and E. B. Ringelstein
Echocontrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery High-Grade Stenosis and Occlusion
Stroke, November 1, 1999; 30(11): 2302 - 2306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.