JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y. J.
Right arrow Articles by Liang, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y. J.
Right arrow Articles by Liang, S. C.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 16, Issue 6 417-423, Copyright © 1997 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography in stage I posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: sonographic-surgical correlation

Y. J. Chen and S. C. Liang
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography in stage I posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Fourteen of the 17 consecutive patients who underwent tenosynovectomy for stage I posterior tibial tendon dysfunction were included in this study. The preoperative diagnosis was based primarily on the clinical suspicion of dysfunction, which was confirmed by ultrasonography. Two measurements were obtained at the midpoint between the insertion site and the medial malleolus in both feet of the 14 patients: the diameter of the posterior tibial tendon and the diameter of the tendon sheath measured from its inner walls. The mean diameter of the tendon was 4.61 +/- 0.50 mm and that of the tendon sheath in the symptomatic foot was 7.24 +/- 0.75. In the unaffected foot, the mean diameter of the tendon was 3.30 +/- 0.34 mm and that of the tendon sheath was 3.64 +/- 0.35 mm, respectively. In the symptomatic tendon, the increase of peritendinous space was significantly higher than the increase in the tendinous portion (P < 0.0001). Surgical findings proved the accuracy of diagnosis in all patients. Although many cases of stage I posterior tibial tendon dysfunction remain undiagnosed owing to the mild clinical symptoms, this series indicates that ultrasonography is a valuable adjunctive diagnostic tool in the clinical examination and assists in achieving an accurate diagnosis of stage I posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, allowing early treatment.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.