JUM etoc signup
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hornberger, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hornberger, L. K.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 16, Issue 2 95-99, Copyright © 1997 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Ventricular discrepancy as a sonographic sign of coarctation of the fetal aorta: how reliable is it?

D. L. Brown, S. M. Durfee and L. K. Hornberger
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value and sensitivity of discrepant ventricular size for fetal aortic coarctation. Postnatal follow-up data were obtained in 42 fetuses in whom ventricular size discrepancy (left ventricle smaller than right ventricle) was recognized on an obstetrical sonogram. Additionally, from postnatal records, we identified infants with coarctation who had had an obstetrical sonogram after 16 weeks. Fourteen of the 42 fetuses had coarctation or other aortic arch obstruction after birth (33% positive predictive value). Eight (62%) of 13 fetuses with ventricular discrepancy recognized before 34 weeks had coarctation, compared with six (21%) true positive cases among 29 recognized after 34 weeks (P = 0.01, Fisher's exact test). Of 21 infants with coarctation, ventricular discrepancy had been recognized by prenatal sonography in 13 (62% sensitivity). Ventricular discrepancy has moderate sensitivity and mediocre positive predictive value for coarctation. The limitations of this finding for diagnosing coarctation, particularly a higher false positive rate after 34 weeks, must be recognized, but it is still a useful sign to identify this potentially ductus-dependent lesion.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Matsui, M. Mellander, M. Roughton, H. Jicinska, and H. M. Gardiner
Morphological and Physiological Predictors of Fetal Aortic Coarctation
Circulation, October 28, 2008; 118(18): 1793 - 1801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.