JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morales-Rosello, J.
Right arrow Articles by Santonja-Lucas, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morales-Rosello, J.
Right arrow Articles by Santonja-Lucas, J. J.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 16, Issue 11 711-717, Copyright © 1997 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Predicted and actual fetal weight throughout the last trimester

J. Morales-Rosello, L. Martinez-Gonzalez and J. J. Santonja-Lucas
Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Valencia, Spain.

The aim of our study was to obtain, in normal pregnancies, references values of predicted and actual fetal weight for both male and female fetuses and for fetuses born to nulliparous and multiparous women between weeks 28 and 41 of gestation. Predicted fetal weight curves represented calculations of weight in the third trimester based on weight data obtained during the second trimester. These curves were obtained from 134 ultrasonograms obtained between weeks 20 and 27. Actual fetal weight curves represented the values calculated from third trimester measurements and were based on 374 ultrasonograms obtained between weeks 28 and 41. For predicted fetal weight minor differences were found between male and female fetuses and between fetuses born to nulliparous and multiparous women. For actual weights, differences increased progressively for gender and parity during the last trimester. Predicted weights progressed at a steeper rate, and this effect was stressed in cases of female fetuses and fetuses born to nulliparous women. If predicted weights reflect normal growth, differences between fetal gender or maternal parity might be due to environmental influences. Therefore, it might not be justified to construct separate weight charts differentiated by sex or parity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
K A I Evensen, T Vik, J Helbostad, M S Indredavik, S Kulseng, and A-M Brubakk
Motor skills in adolescents with low birth weight
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2004; 89(5): F451 - F455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.