JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teefey, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Peters, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teefey, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Peters, M. G.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 16, Issue 10 641-645, Copyright © 1997 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


CLINICAL TRIAL

Doppler sonographic evaluation of the portal vein: effects of intravenous dodecafluoropentane

S. A. Teefey, W. D. Middleton, T. M. Crowe and M. G. Peters
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

The aim of this study was to determine if the intravascular contrast agent dodecafluoropentane (Phase III Clinical Trial) produces enhancement and facilitates visualization of portal vein and collateral blood flow. Twenty patients with advanced liver disease or an orthotopic liver transplant underwent gray scale, duplex, and color Doppler sonography. Sonograms were obtained prior to and after the randomized administration of a placebo and dodecafluoropentane in a double-blind fashion. Blinded readers independently reviewed all videotapes. Separate comparisons were made between the baseline study and placebo or dodecafluoropentane study for portal vein enhancement, increase in portal vein length or branching, and patency of the portal vein and collaterals. Flow enhancement was seen with dodecafluoropentane in 17 of 20 (85%) cases and with saline solution in zero cases. Improved visualization of the portal vein or collateral length or branching was observed with dodecafluoropentane in 11 of 20 (55%) cases and with saline solution in zero cases. Portal vein or collateral flow was not detected in six baseline studies. In two of six (33%) cases, flow was detected with dodecafluoropentane. Our results show that dodecafluoropentane is capable of enhancing portal vein and collateral flow, can improve visualization of portal vein length and its branches, and may be useful in cases in which portal vein flow cannot be demonstrated by noncontrast sonography.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.