JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turetschek, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mostbeck, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turetschek, K.
Right arrow Articles by Mostbeck, G. H.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 15, Issue 7 517-522, Copyright © 1996 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Power Doppler versus color Doppler imaging in renal allograft evaluation

K. Turetschek, C. Nasel, P. Wunderbaldinger, K. Diem, K. Hittmair and G. H. Mostbeck
Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Austria.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of PDS compared to conventional CDI in the followup of 72 renal allograft patients. Renal allograft vascularization, assessed by PDS and CDI, was scored from 0 to 4, where 0 was the cortical "blush" and 4 was residual central perfusion. These scores were correlated with the resistive index, serum creatinine levels, hematocrit, and, in 35 cases, biopsy results. PDS scores of renal perfusion were one grade lower than CDI scores in 59 of 72 patients and two grades lower in two of 72 patients. A statistically significant correlation was found between PDS scores and the RI (r2 = 0.6, P < 0.05). However, no significant correlation was found between PDS scores and creatinine levels or hematocrit values. PDS scores are not related to histologic findings in renal allograft dysfunction. Overall, five biopsy-related arteriovenous fistulas were detected, two of which were missed on the initial PDS examination. In conclusion, PDS provides more complete visualization of the renal allograft vessel tree than CDI. However, biopsy-related arteriovenous fistulas are better seen by CDI.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. H. Kim, H. W. Eun, H. J. Lee, D. E. Goo, and D. L. Choi
Clinical Use of Renal Perfusion Imaging by Means of Harmonic Sonography With a Microbubble Contrast Agent in Patients After Renal Transplantation: Preliminary Study
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2005; 24(6): 755 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.