JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, K.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harrington, K.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, S.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 15, Issue 10 715-720, Copyright © 1996 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Measurement of volume flow with time domain and M-mode imaging: in vitro and in vivo validation studies

K. Harrington, C. Deane and S. Campbell
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Homerton Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Color velocity imaging quantification is a commercially available technique that estimates volume flow within vessels by combining velocity data, acquired by time domain correlation, with vessel diameter measurements obtained by M-mode imaging. By integrating the velocity profile over time, quantitative volume flow calculations may be made. To investigate the accuracy of this system, we used two flow phantoms over a range of steady and pulsatile flows for in vitro evaluation, and the common carotid artery of 10 women on five consecutive occasions was insonated for in vivo assessment. In flow phantom studies, accuracy was within 8% for flows above 200 ml/min, but decreased at lower flows depending on the depth, beam-vessel angle used, and steering of the beam. At angles greater than 70 degrees, velocity errors made quantitative measurement of flow unreliable, whereas at angles less than 30 degrees, the increased error in calculating vessel diameter led to large errors of area estimation, and hence made flow measurements unreliable. For the in vivo studies on the carotid artery the intraoperator repeatability values for the three operators were 9.92% (A), 13.74% (B), and 13.24% (C). The interoperator repeatability for the group was 15.30%. This study suggests that the color velocity imaging quantification technique is an accurate and reproducible method of assessing volume flow in vessels. However, in our experience, obtaining volume flow data is more time consuming and operator dependent than traditional Doppler techniques. The color velocity imaging quantification system may be of use in monitoring conditions in which changes in volume flow in a vessel or to an organ is an important part of the disease process.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. S. Y. Ho, W. W-m. Lam, S. C. P. Ng, M. K. Lam, M. T. V. Chan, W. S. Poon, and C. Metreweli
Cerebral Vasoreactivity: A Comparison of Color Velocity Imaging Quantification and Stable Xenon-Enhanced CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 948 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. L. Zanen, I. M. Toonder, E. Korten, C. H. A. Wittens, and P. P. N. M. Diderich
Flow measurements in dialysis shunts: lack of agreement between conventional Doppler, CVI-Q, and ultrasound dilution
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2001; 16(2): 395 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.