JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blickstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Barzili, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blickstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Barzili, N.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 14, Issue 9 661-664, Copyright © 1995 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Echogenicity of fibroadenoma and carcinoma of the breast. Quantitative comparison using gain-assisted densitometric evaluation of sonograms

I. Blickstein, R. Goldchmit, S. D. Strano, R. D. Goldman and N. Barzili
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Hospital, Rehovot, Israel.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of ultrasonography in differentiation between the echogenic characteristics of carcinoma and those of fibroadenoma of the breast. Two mathematical transformations of the measured density on a sonographic image of the breast lesion at three different system gain settings were used in cases of carcinoma (n = 16) and fibroadenoma (n = 31) to provide standardized density values. A significant correlation was found between the tumor and the surrounding tissue densities in both carcinomas (r = 0.77, P = 0.0004) and fibroadenomas (r = 0.79, P < 0.000001. The mean standardized density of the tumor was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than the surrounding tissue in both carcinomas (2.03 +/- 0.64 D versus 1.23 +/- 0.38 D) and fibroadenomas (2.09 +/- 0.48 D versus 1.33 +/- 0.3 D). However, the differences between density values of carcinoma and fibroadenomas were not significantly different. The data suggest that it may not be possible to differentiate breast carcinoma and fibroadenomas on the basis of the echogenicity of solid breast masses.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D.-R. Chen, R.-F. Chang, and Y.-L. Huang
Computer-aided Diagnosis Applied to US of Solid Breast Nodules by Using Neural Networks
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 407 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.