JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blickstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blickstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, R. D.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 14, Issue 7 509-513, Copyright © 1995 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Quantitative comparison of two distinct echogenic structures appearing on the same image using gain-assisted densitometric evaluation of sonograms (GADES)

I. Blickstein, R. Goldchmit, S. D. Strano and R. D. Goldman
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Hospital, Rehovot, Israel.

Gain-assisted densitometric evaluation of sonograms with two distinct echogenic structures appearing on each image was performed to establish if their density-gain setting curves have similar inclinations. We used the breast model (n = 67) in which hyperechoic masses were compared to the surrounding hyperechoic tissue at the optimal gain (Gopt) and at Gopt + 5. Both structures had significantly different film-corrected densities and showed a linear decline of density as the system gain increased from Gopt - 5 to Gopt + 5. The least squares regression lines were almost parallel. The density-gain unit decrease from Gopt - 5 to Gopt was not different, but the decrease from Gopt to Gopt + 5 reached statistical significance. The data suggest that skewed values are theoretically possible in comparing two distinct echogenic structures. However, within the gain intervals used in GADES, these differences are negligible and comparisons are as accurate as with the assessment of a single echogenic structure.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.