JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Todros, T.
Right arrow Articles by et, al.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Todros, T.
Right arrow Articles by et, al.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 14, Issue 5 343-348, Copyright © 1995 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Performance of Doppler ultrasonography as a screening test in low risk pregnancies: results of a multicentric study

T. Todros, E. Ferrazzi, D. Arduini, S. Bastonero, V. Bezzeccheri, M. Biolcati, B. Bonazzi, S. Gabrielli, G. L. Pilu, G. Rizzo and al. et
Istituto di Ginecologica e Ostetrica, Universita di Torino, Italy.

To assess the efficacy of the Doppler velocimetry of the uterine and umbilical arteries as a screening test for preeclampsia and fetal growth retardation, we studied 916 low risk pregnancies. The S/D ratios of the uterine and umbilical arteries were obtained at 19 to 24 weeks and at 26 to 31 weeks of gestational age. Mean values, receiver operator curves, and the diagnostic accuracy of the tests were calculated for the following end-points: (1) pregnancy-induced hypertension, (2) low birth weight for gestational age, (3) small for gestational age with abnormal outcome, (4) pregnancy-induced hypertension needing preterm delivery. The prevalences for these outcomes were 3.4%, 4.6%, 1%, and 0.7%, respectively. The study was blinded. The umbilical and uterine artery S/D ratios were significantly higher in the abnormal than in the normal outcome group. When uterine arteries were studied at 19 to 24 weeks, sensitivity was 59% in the detection of pregnancy-induced hypertension, 11% in the detection of small for gestational age fetuses, 33% in the detection of small for gestational age fetuses with abnormal outcome, and 83% in the detection of pregnancy induced hypertension needing preterm delivery; the corresponding values for specificity were 69%, 94%, 94%, and 68%. At 26 to 31 weeks the sensitivity values were respectively, 69%, 58%, 75%, and 100% and specificity values were 80%, 59%, 39%, and 79%. When umbilical arteries were studied at 19 to 24 weeks, sensitivity was 38% in the detection of pregnancy-induced hypertension, 46% in the detection of small for gestational age fetuses, 78% in the detection of small for gestational age fetuses with abnormal outcome, and 67% in the detection of pregnancy-induced hypertension needing preterm delivery. The corresponding values of specificity were 74% for all four groups. At 26 to 31 weeks the sensitivity values were 38%, 43%, 87%, and 67%, respectively, and specificity values were 80% for all four groups. We concluded that Doppler examinations of the uterine and umbilical arteries can detect, at midpregnancy, the severe forms of pregnancy-induced hypertension and small for gestational age fetuses but they cannot be used to screen a low risk population in which the prevalence of the disease is low, and hence the positive predictive value is low.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
B. Vasapollo, G. P. Novelli, and H. Valensise
Total Vascular Resistance and Left Ventricular Morphology as Screening Tools for Complications in Pregnancy
Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 1020 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
S. F. Bork
Female Reproductive Arterial Blood Flow and Its Relation to Infertility
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, November 1, 1996; 12(6): 281 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.