JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nadel, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Benacerraf, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nadel, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Benacerraf, B. R.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 14, Issue 4 297-302, Copyright © 1995 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Can the presumed risk of autosomal trisomy be decreased in fetuses of older women following a normal sonogram?

A. S. Nadel, B. Bromley, F. D. Frigoletto Jr and B. R. Benacerraf
Department of Obstetrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

Previous studies showed that a sonographic scoring system can be used to identify women under age 35 who are at an increased risk for a fetal autosomal trisomy. We propose to use the same scoring system to select women over age 35 who are at a decreased risk of a fetal autosomal trisomy because the ultrasonogram is normal. We reviewed the sonographic scores of 97 trisomic and 694 normal control fetuses from two previously published consecutive series designed to identify women at increased risk for an affected fetus. Using the same scoring index in this study, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of a score = 0 zero for identifying fetuses with autosomal trisomy. We then applied Bayes' theorem to determine the probability of an autosomal trisomy at various maternal ages, given a sonographic score of 0. Of the 97 fetuses with an autosomal trisomy, 83 had a score of > or = 1, for a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI 77-92%). Of the 694 control fetuses with normal karyotype, 606 had a score of 0, for a specificity of 87% (95% CI 83-89%). A 42 year old woman's probability of an autosomal trisomy if the sonographic score is 0 becomes equivalent to the age-specific probability for a 35 year old woman. Using the lower limit of the CIs for sensitivity and specificity, we calculated that the probability of having a fetus with an autosomal trisomy falls from 18.8 in 1000 to 5.3 in 1000 for a 40 year old woman with a sonographic score of 0.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. Bromley, E. Lieberman, T. D. Shipp, and B. R. Benacerraf
The Genetic Sonogram: A Method of Risk Assessment for Down Syndrome in the Second Trimester
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2002; 21(10): 1087 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. M. Vintzileos, E. R. Guzman, J. C. Smulian, L. Yeo, W. E. Scorza, and R. A. Knuppel
Second-Trimester Genetic Sonography in Patients With Advanced Maternal Age and Normal Triple Screen
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2002; 99(6): 993 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. Smith-Bindman, W. Hosmer, V. A. Feldstein, J. J. Deeks, and J. D. Goldberg
Second-Trimester Ultrasound to Detect Fetuses With Down Syndrome: A Meta-analysis
JAMA, February 28, 2001; 285(8): 1044 - 1055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. C. Winter, S. B. Uhrich, V. L. Souter, and D. A. Nyberg
The "Genetic Sonogram": Comparison of the Index Scoring System with the Age-adjusted US Risk Assessment
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 775 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. C. RANZINI, E. R. GUZMAN, C. V. ANANTH, D. DAY-SALVATORE, A. J. FISHER, and A. M. VINTZILEOS
Sonographic Identification of Fetuses With Down Syndrome in the Third Trimester: A Matched Control Study
Obstet. Gynecol., May 1, 1999; 93(5): 702 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.