JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sisler, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tilcock, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sisler, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tilcock, C.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 14, Issue 4 267-272, Copyright © 1995 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of cellulose concentration on the efficacy of a cellulose-based oral contrast agent for gastrointestinal ultrasonography

W. J. Sisler and C. Tilcock
Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

We investigated the value of an ingested gastrointestinal ultrasonographic transmission (GUT) agent in improving the visualization of visceral and retroperitoneal anatomy during the standard abdominal sonographic examination. In particular, we examined the effect of varying the cellulose dispersion concentration on the ability of this agent to facilitate visualization of bowel mucosa and adjacent organs and compared degassed cellulose dispersions to degassed water in the same subjects. Fasting abdominal ultrasonography was performed on 24 healthy human volunteers before and after ingestion of a degassed cellulose-based liquid transmission agent. Each agent was assessed using 22 microns fiber length cellulose dispersions at 1, 2 and 3% wt/vol. Ingestion of all concentrations of the gastrointestinal sonographic transmission agent resulted in clear differentiation of the bowel from adjacent structures. Statistically significant improvement in visualization of the pancreas, retroperitoneal vessels, left kidney, and spleen was noted at 20 minutes postingestion. No statistically significant difference was identified between the three cellulose concentrations. No toxicity or limiting side effects were encountered. Such agents may obviate additional imaging in patients who previously would have had a suboptimal ultrasonographic examination.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. M. Abu-Yousef and Y. El-Zein
Improved US Visualization of the Pancreatic Tail with Simethicone, Water, and Patient Rotation
Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 780 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.