JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bamber, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Bamber, J. C.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 14, Issue 3 217-227, Copyright © 1995 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Adaptive speckle reduction for improving the differential diagnosis of breast lesions

D. C. Crawford, D. O. Cosgrove, E. Tohno, C. Bossi, R. Kedar, D. S. Bell, S. Kale, A. Norman and J. C. Bamber
Department of Ultrasound, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom.

Adaptive speckle reduction could mask diagnostic features and adversely affect diagnosis of focal breast lesions. Four radiologists assessed focal breast lesions (29 malignant and 31 benign) by blind review of representative static B-mode scans before and after adaptive speckle reduction processing, scoring 14 diagnostic features for breast cancer and recording their opinions on the diagnosis and on how adaptive speckle reduction affected interpretation of each feature. No adverse affect on diagnosis of malignant (P = 0.756) or benign (P = 1.000) breast lesions was found, despite some differences in scoring of the diagnostic features after adaptive speckle reduction. Observer recognition of most diagnostic features was easier after adaptive speckle reduction (e.g., edge definition [50% of cases], edge regularity [40%], lesion texture [44%], and lesion echogenicity [35%]).





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.