JUM etoc signup
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilja, O. H.
Right arrow Articles by Berstad, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilja, O. H.
Right arrow Articles by Berstad, A.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 14, Issue 2 81-89, Copyright © 1995 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Monitoring postprandial size of the proximal stomach by ultrasonography

O. H. Gilja, T. Hausken, S. Odegaard and A. Berstad
Medical Department A, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

The purpose of this study was to develop a sonographic method to monitor postprandial size of the proximal stomach. Twenty-three healthy persons were scanned in a sitting position with a 3.25 MHz transducer after ingestion of 500 ml meat soup. The area in a sagittal section and the maximal diameter in an oblique frontal section were chosen as standard measurements. The soup emptied from the proximal stomach in a linear manner (r = 0.99) and at a rate of 2.0 +/- 1.3%/min. Intraobserver error of the scans (mean +/- SD) was 5.6% +/- 2.3% and 9.5% +/- 4.5% for sagittal area and frontal diameter, respectively, and the corresponding interobserver error was 5.3% +/- 4.0% and 8.3% +/- 5.3%, respectively. This sonographic method demonstrated a moderate day-to-day variation, had low intra- and interobserver error, and allowed estimation of initial emptying fractions of the proximal stomach.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
M W Mundt and M Samsom
Fundal dysaccommodation in functional dyspepsia: head-to-head comparison between the barostat and three-dimensional ultrasonographic technique
Gut, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 1725 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
D. D. Burton, H. J. Kim, M. Camilleri, D. A. Stephens, B. P. Mullan, M. K. O'Connor, and N. J. Talley
Relationship of gastric emptying and volume changes after a solid meal in humans
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): G261 - G266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M. W. Mundt, T. Hausken, and M. Samsom
Effect of intragastric barostat bag on proximal and distal gastric accommodation in response to liquid meal
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): G681 - G686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
H. Gregersen, O. H. Gilja, T. Hausken, A. Heimdal, C. Gao, K. Matre, S. Odegaard, and A. Berstad
Mechanical properties in the human gastric antrum using B-mode ultrasonography and antral distension
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): G368 - G375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.