JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schiller, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tsuchiyama, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schiller, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tsuchiyama, K.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 14, Issue 11 799-803, Copyright © 1995 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Development of hydrosalpinx during ovulation induction

V. L. Schiller and K. Tsuchiyama
Tower Imaging-Century City Hospital Center for Reproductive Medicine, California, USA.

We have observed that hydrosalpinx develops in some patients undergoing ovulation induction as part of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer and gamete intrafallopian transfer programs. Increased tubal secretions due to multihormonal stimulation causes a blocked tube to distend by the time of oocyte harvest. In a subset of women, hydrosalpinx was not identified on initial pelvic sonograms. Hydrosalpinx became apparent during serial sonography to monitor follicular development. We performed a retrospective chart review of these cases in order to confirm this finding with hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy. Nine of 316 women developed unilateral (eight cases) or bilateral hydrosalpinx (one case) during stimulation. Recognition of this sonographic finding is important to the referring physician because it has important therapeutic and outcome implications.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. Benjaminov and M. Atri
Sonography of the Abnormal Fallopian Tube
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 737 - 742.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Bildirici, O. Bukulmez, A. Ensari, H. Yarali, and T. Gurgan
A prospective evaluation of the effect of salpingectomy on endometrial receptivity in cases of women with communicating hydrosalpinges
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2422 - 2426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Ejdrup Bredkjær, S. Ziebe, B. Hamid, Y. Zhou, A. Loft, A. Lindhard, and A. Nyboe Andersen
Delivery rates after in-vitro fertilization following bilateral salpingectomy due to hydrosalpinges: a case control study
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 1999; 14(1): 101 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.