JUM Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tepper, R.
Right arrow Articles by Beyth, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tepper, R.
Right arrow Articles by Beyth, Y.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 14, Issue 10 731-734, Copyright © 1995 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Transvaginal color flow imaging in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors

R. Tepper, L. Lerner-Geva, M. M. Altaras, S. Goldberger, G. Ben-Baruch, S. Markov, I. Cohen and Y. Beyth
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sapir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Transvaginal ultrasonography and color flow imaging, performed to investigate whether there is any diagnostic advantage, were assessed over a 3 year period in 217 patients with adnexal masses prior to explorative laparotomy. Gray scale sonography and color Doppler flow were performed 1 day prior to surgery. Benign tumors were found in 165 patients and flow was detectable in 82 (49.7%); 14 patients had tumors of low malignant potential, 12 (85.7%) of whom showed detectable flow, and 38 had malignant tumors, in 25 (65.8%) of whom flow was detectable. Blood flow velocity was evaluated by the calculation of the resistance index prior to surgery. Mean resistive index was 0.39 +/- 0.05 for malignant tumors, compared with 0.49 +/- 0.06 and 0.55 +/- 0.07 for the low malignant potential and benign tumors, respectively. These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01). When a resistive index of 0.47 was considered the cut-off value, the sensitivity was 88% and the specificity was calculated to be 85% (using color Doppler flow as the only diagnostic method). With our large cohort of patients, we demonstration the contribution of color Doppler flow examination in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian tumors prior to surgery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Kinkel, H. Hricak, Y. Lu, K. Tsuda, and R. A. Filly
US Characterization of Ovarian Masses: A Meta-Analysis
Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 803 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. B. Kurtz, J. V. Tsimikas, C. M. C. Tempany, U. M. Hamper, P. H. Arger, R. L. Bree, R. J. Wechsler, I. R. Francis, J. E. Kuhlman, E. S. Siegelman, et al.
Diagnosis and Staging of Ovarian Cancer: Comparative Values of Doppler and Conventional US, CT, and MR Imaging Correlated with Surgery and Histopathologic Analysis—Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.