JUM Parker Laboratories, Inc
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blickstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blickstein, I.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, R.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 13, Issue 9 675-678, Copyright © 1994 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

The relation between different system gain settings and the accuracy of densitometric assessment of echogenicity

I. Blickstein and R. Goldman
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Hospital, Rehorot, Israel.

Two mathematical transformations of the measured density of a sonographic image of the fetal liver were used in 19 patients at nine different system gain settings (G) (optimal G number [dB] and optimal G number +/- 2, +/- 4, +/- 8, +/- 12). A significant correlation was found between the film-corrected density (Dcor) and gain interval from the optimal gain (Dcor = 1.39-0.052 [G interval], R = -0.81, P < 0.00001, 95% confidence limits = -0.052 +/- 0.052). After standardization of the values to the arbitrary G number of 49 (Dcor 49), a gain-independent convergence of the values was found. In 79% of the 19 cases the accuracy of the method was very high, as estimated from a small coefficient of variation. No significant difference was found in comparing the mean standardized densities derived from paired measurements (i.e., optimal G number +/- 2, +/- 4, +/- 8, and +/- 12). The data support background assumptions for the quantitative assessment or echogenicity by transmission densitometry and provide highly confident accuracy estimates.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D.-R. Chen, R.-F. Chang, and Y.-L. Huang
Computer-aided Diagnosis Applied to US of Solid Breast Nodules by Using Neural Networks
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 407 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.