JUM etoc signup
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aliotta, A.
Right arrow Articles by de Vitis, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aliotta, A.
Right arrow Articles by de Vitis, I.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 13, Issue 9 665-669, Copyright © 1994 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


CLINICAL TRIAL

Ultrasonographic signs of sliding, gastric, and hiatal hernia: their prospective evaluation

A. Aliotta, G. L. Rapaccini, M. Pompili, A. Grattagliano, A. Cedrone, C. Trombino, F. de Luca and I. de Vitis
Istituto de Clinica Medica, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

This study was conducted to identify the sonographic findings that might be used to diagnose sliding gastric hiatal hernia. We first performed a retrospective evaluation of 12 patients known to have sliding hiatal hernia and 18 normal controls. In the controls the esophagogastric junction could be visualized clearly in all cases and the alimentary tract cross section at the diaphragmatic hiatus ranged from 7.1 to 10.0 mm. The esophagogastric junction was not visualized in any of the hernia patients, whose alimentary tract diameters measurements ranged from 16.0 to 21.0 mm. These two markers (non visualization of the function and diameter greater than 16 mm) were then evaluated for their ability to predict the occurrence of sliding hiatas hernia in a prospective study of 38 patients subsequently diagnosed by means of barium studies and endoscopy. In this group, each sign had a positive predictive value of 100%. The negative predictive value of the alimentary tract diameter was 90%; that of non-visualization of the esophagogastric junction was 94.7%. Inclusion of ultrasonography in the initial work-up of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux may reduce the need for more invasive diagnostic procedures.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.