JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chescheir, N. C.
Right arrow Articles by Reitnauer, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chescheir, N. C.
Right arrow Articles by Reitnauer, P. J.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 13, Issue 6 451-456, Copyright © 1994 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

A comparative study of prenatal diagnosis and perinatal autopsy

N. C. Chescheir and P. J. Reitnauer
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of prenatal ultrasonography and to identify patterns of fetal malformations. All fetal and neonatal autopsies over a 3 year period were compared to prenatal sonographic findings and comparisons were made between the results of the two examinations. We identified 133 fetuses and neonates who had both a complete autopsy and a perinatal autopsy. Approximately 87% of autopsy-demonstrated major abnormalities had been detected by prenatal ultrasonography, with 61% of all malformations detected. Some limitations in accuracy of prenatal diagnosis are unavoidable, but strict attention to a thorough fetal examination should improve accuracy. Autopsy examination remains an important component of the evaluation of perinatal losses, especially if dysmorphology is known or suspected.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
Z. Szigeti, A. Csaba, B. Pete, J. Hajdu, Z. Papp, and C. Papp
Correlation of Prenatal Sonographic Diagnosis and Morphologic Findings of Fetal Autopsy in Fetuses With Trisomy 21
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 61 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. Yeo, E. R. Guzman, S. Shen-Schwarz, C. Walters, and A. M. Vintzileos
Value of a Complete Sonographic Survey in Detecting Fetal Abnormalities: Correlation With Perinatal Autopsy
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2002; 21(5): 501 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. J. Zehr, J. R. Liddicoat, J. D. Salazar, A. M. Gillinov, R. H. Hruban, G. M. Hutchins, and D. E. Cameron
The Autopsy: Still Important in Cardiac Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1997; 64(2): 380 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.