JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shipley, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shipley, C. F., 3rd
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, G. H.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 13, Issue 2 99-104, Copyright © 1994 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


CLINICAL TRIAL

Comparison of transvaginal sonography with endometrial biopsy in asymptomatic postmenopausal women

C. F. Shipley 3rd, C. L. Simmons and G. H. Nelson

The purpose of this study was to compare TVS with endometrial biopsy as a screening technique in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Asymptomatic postmenopausal women were recruited by newspaper advertisement. Each study patient was subjected to pelvic examination and TVS followed by endometrial biopsy. Patients with suspected endometrial abnormalities by TVS (normal by endometrial biopsy) were evaluated further with hysteroscopy with biopsy or D~C or both. Eight patients were identified as having abnormalities by TVS, only one of whom had abnormalities by initial endometrial biopsy. Two patients were identified as having abnormalities by endometrial biopsy and normal by TVS. Further evaluation of the seven patients identified as having abnormalities by TVS (normal by endometrial biopsy) documented all seven patients as having abnormalities. The total yield of abnormalities with TVS was 16% (eight of 50 patients). The total yield of abnormalities with endometrial biopsy was 6% (three of 50 patients). The sensitivity of TVS in identifying endometrial abnormalities was 80% (eight of 10), while endometrial biopsy was only 30% (three of 10). TVS was more sensitive in detecting endometrial abnormalities, including endometrial hyperplasia, than was endometrial biopsy. The use of endometrial biopsy as a screening technique in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients is questioned.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. E. Hann, C. M. Kim, M. Gonen, R. Barakat, P. H. Choi, and A. M. Bach
Sonohysterography Compared With Endometrial Biopsy for Evaluation of the Endometrium in Tamoxifen-Treated Women
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2003; 22(11): 1173 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. M. Ascher, I. Imaoka, and J. M. Lage
Tamoxifen-induced Uterine Abnormalities: The Role of Imaging1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 29 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. Smith-Bindman, K. Kerlikowske, V. A. Feldstein, L. Subak, J. Scheidler, M. Segal, R. Brand, and D. Grady
Endovaginal Ultrasound to Exclude Endometrial Cancer and Other Endometrial Abnormalities
JAMA, November 4, 1998; 280(17): 1510 - 1517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.