JUM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Makela, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lehtovirta, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Makela, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lehtovirta, P.

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol 12, Issue 5 255-258, Copyright © 1993 by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Pretreatment sonographic evaluation of inguinal lymph nodes in patients with vulvar malignancy

P. J. Makela, A. Leminen, M. Kaariainen and P. Lehtovirta
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.

The state of the inguinal nodes is a major prognostic factor in vulvar carcinoma. Because of new surgical trends with selective inguinal lymphadenectomy, the preoperative evaluation of inguinal lymph nodes is essential for adequate treatment of vulvar carcinoma. To evaluate the adequacy of clinical examination and high-frequency transducer sonography in detecting metastatic inguinal lymph nodes, we studied 25 patients with vulvar malignancy who underwent operation. Histopathologically proved lymph node metastases were found in 11 (22%) of 50 inguinal areas studied. All of the suspected metastases were in patients with stage III-IV disease. The inguinal lymph node metastases were found by sonography in nine (82%), by preoperative palpation in one (9%), and by operative palpation in six (55%) of 11 areas. The difference between sonography and palpation was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 87% for sonography, 9% and 100% for preoperative palpation, and 55% and 90% for operative palpation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
M.-H. Schmid-Wendtner and W. Burgdorf
Ultrasound Scanning in Dermatology
Arch Dermatol, February 1, 2005; 141(2): 217 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.